*

Bob Bauer, currently White House Counsel, was formerly the Counsel to DNC Services Corporation and Obama for America, Barack Obama’s Presidential campaign. (BOB BAUER BIOGRAPHY) In January 2009, he defended Mr. Obama in Hollister v. Soetoro, a lawsuit aimed at exposing his client was Constitutionally unqualified for POTUS. HOLLISTER v. SOETORO (Mr. Hollister was represented by Attorney Phil Berg.) Mr. Bauer submitted his usual Motion to Dismiss – this was not the first lawsuit aimed at reaching his client’s eligibility – but this time, seeking to take advantage of the opportunity provided by this lawsuit to end the barrage of eligibility based challenges both inside and outside of the courtroom, he added something new: a footnote asking the judge to take judicial notice of certain facts, which notice he would recycle to construct the fiction, his client was Constitutionally qualified to be POTUS.

“Judicial notice” is a term found in the Federal Rules of Evidence. It applies to getting facts into the court record and, once those facts have been added to the record, assigns what weight this evidence will receive. (For a full explanation of judicial notice, see the Federal Rules of Evidence at http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm.)

Simply put, a judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.

Mr. Bauer wanted the federal court to take judicial notice of these facts.

1. His client, Barack Obama “publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii.”

This fact is true. But it fails to establish, his client is Constitutionally qualified to be POTUS.

The only such self-authenticating ‘document’ his client “publicly produced” was that heavily redacted Certification of Live Birth – recall, Mr. Obama re-named this, his “Official Birth Certificate” – posted on “Fight the Smears,” the web site clearly advertising in the footer, this was “PAID FOR BY BARACK OBAMA.” But even if the document was authentic AND the information contained therein was true, at best this could only establish his client is a “native” citizen, but not Natural Born. Mr. Obama admitted right on that site, this COLB only established he is a “native citizen” and not Natural Born. (See, MODEL COMPLAINTS OF ELECTION FRAUD TO STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL IN APPLICABLE STATES, on this page.)

Question: Since Bob Bauer was motivated to stave off attacks against his client by trying to construct Mr. Obama’s Constitutional qualifications for POTUS, why did he try to get the court to take judicial notice that his client publicly produced a certified document showing he was born in HI, when even assuming the fact he produced such a document also meant, he was actually born in HI; that fact could only establish he was a “native” citizen but not Natural Born as required by the Constitution?
Answer: Because if the court had taken judicial notice of these facts which implied his client was born in HI; Mr. Bauer could have perverted such notice into the meme, the federal court has now ruled, his client was born in HI; and, further, Mr. Bauer would have claimed, being born in HI makes him a NBC, propaganda which he and his clients, DNC Services Corporation, would have plastered throughout the print and electronic media. This campaign of propaganda emanating from the man who wrote the book – literally – on federal election law likely would have neutralized the mounting challenges to his client’s Constitutional qualification for POTUS.

Anyway, while referring to this ‘public production’ of a document showing his client was born in HI, Mr. Bauer did not submit the ‘original’ COLB to the court.

Question: Given that Mr. Bauer asked the court to take judicial notice his client produced that COLB, for what reason did he fail to produce for the court, the actual document?
Answer: Because he knew that COLB posted on his client’s blog is bogus.

2. Mr. Bauer wrote, “See, e.g., Factcheck.org, “Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s birth certificate,” available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections 2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper).”

These facts are true, too. But they also fail to establish, his client is Constitutionally qualified to be POTUS.

Mr. Bauer omits the name “Annenberg” from the proper title of the organization; and fails to reveal to the court, this group is sponsored by his client’s former employer, Chicago Annenberg Challenge, information the court is unlikely to know, absent his revelation; and which financial relationship a reasonable person would expect him to reveal as material to the court’s consideration. He also fails to name the “Honolulu newspaper” he claims printed that “contemporaneous birth announcement.” (The court could not know, APFC failed to name this publication which they “not[ed],” too, unless Mr. Bauer revealed this material information.) Recall, this ‘announcement’ is actually an unattributed image posted anonymously on the td blog, which APFC admits it copied from that site to post on theirs. RUMORS, LIES, AND UNSUBSTANTIATED ‘FACTS’

Not surprisingly, while seeking judicial notice APFC noted this contemporaneous newspaper birth announcement showing his client was born in HI, Mr. Bauer did not submit an ‘original’ of that document to the court, either.

Plus, notwithstanding Mr. Bauer has now asked the court to take judicial notice [Annenberg Political] Fact Check said the document Mr. Obama publicly produced is “genuine,” again, he failed to produce that “genuine” document for the court.

Question: Why did Mr. Bauer ask the court to take judicial notice APFC said, the COLB his client publicly produced was “genuine”; but fail to introduce into evidence, the actual COLB?
Answer: Because he knew that COLB posted on his client’s blog is bogus.

3. Mr. Bauer asked the court to take judicial notice, “Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obama’s “original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” ”

This fact is true. Again, it fails to establish, his client is Constitutionally qualified to be POTUS.

Hawaiian officials allegedly made this statement in late October 2008. Notice, the statement attributed to these officials does not include the words, ‘This “original birth certificate” we have on file indicates, Mr. Obama was born in HI.’ Indeed, Mr. Bauer does not allege these officials said, ‘He was born in HI.’ http://blogs.starbulletin.com/inpolitics/certified/

Lucky for us, the federal court took no such notice. Getting lay people to understand the fact that nothing in the public record establishes BO is a NBC, has been challenging enough, without having to explain the difference between these judicially noted “facts” and the lies Mr. Bauer and the members of the Corporation he represents would insist these facts actually mean.

Luckier for Mr. Bauer, neither Judge James Robertson nor Mr. Berg inquired as to where is this “genuine” document of HI birth he claims his client “publicly produced”; or the “contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper”; or the “original birth certificate” HI officials claim to have on file. (How do you suppose Mr. Bauer would have responded to such request from the bench or opposing counsel, for production of that “original birth certificate” those HI officials said is “on record”?) Because Mr. Bauer is a member of the D.C. Bar and according to the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct, these examples of lack of “Candor to Tribunal”; or lack of “Truthfulness in Statement to Others”; or failure to display “Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel” could cost Mr. Bauer his license to practice law. See, DC RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

Which leads us to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, 3rd in line of Presidential succession who, acting in a non-governmental role as Chair of the 2008 DNC Convention, swore in August 2008 Mr. Bauer’s client was Constitutionally qualified for POTUS in the official DNC Services Corporation Certifications of Nomination that were submitted to election officials in dozens of states to get his name printed on the general election ballot.

Question: Instead of asking for judicial notice of representations made by APFC, notice which at best could only establish his client was a “native” of HI but not “Natural Born”; why didn’t Mr. Bauer ask the court to take judicial notice of Nancy Pelosi’s Certifications, let alone submit even 1 (one) of those Certifications into the court record?
Answer: Because he knew Nancy Pelosi’s sworn Certifications of Nomination submitted to state election officials are bogus, too.

Question: But given that Bob Bauer was willing to risk his license to practice law by tricking the court into taking judicial notice of misleading facts that, at best, could only establish Barack Obama was a “native” born citizen, anyway, and which notice he would have to message in order to dupe Americans into believing this meant, his client was also Constitutionally qualified for POTUS; why was he unwilling to risk his license on Nancy Pelosi’s Certifications, which explicitly stated, his client was Constitutionally qualified for the job of POTUS, judicial notice of which fact the court likely would have granted, and which notice more likely could have persuaded the public of the fact, his client was Natural Born?
Answer: Because at that time, Nancy Pelosi was his client, too, and under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct, he could not exonerate one client facing a civil lawsuit by incriminating another in criminal election fraud.

For your information, here are CONTACTS AT THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR.

A poster on the CW blog proposed, everyone involved in ‘outing’ BO should convene and decide to unify the focus. Here is my response.

jbjd // November 18, 2009 at 8:45 pm

Maddie // November 18, 2009 at 8:21 pm

JS @1:33 resistnet—see JS’s link above.

Excellent ideas….

We can do it! We need to brain-storm on how to get all groups together to pursue this 1 and only 1 goal – to expose and remove Obama! With all the patriots from all groups bombarding Congress and media non-stop, with all protests focused on 1 and only 1 issue – is Obama eligible to be POTUS? As we march along, more and more people will be educated on this issue. More people will join the war. The war gets bigger and bigger until they surrender!

This idea will only work IF everyone involved is prepared to drop ANY discussion of dual citizenship; or birth certificate vs. Certification; or social security numbers; or HI officials from the DoH; or quo warranto; or any other issue than this: Nancy Pelosi, on what basis did you determine BO is Constitutionally qualified to be POTUS when you signed those official DNC Certifications of Nomination you submitted to state election officials in states that required the candidate to be qualified for the job in order to get his name printed on the general election ballot.

You already have evidence, she refused to answer the question. You have evidence, then DNC General Counsel Joseph Sandler answered written requests from voters seeking this information, by explaining, the DNC is not a public agency and, therefore, is not subject to a public records request. Yep; he took the time to write all that out but still failed to list the documentary basis for Certifying BO was Constitutionally qualified for the job. (In some states, Mr. Sandler forwarded NP’s Certification to state election officials.)

If the people who have been raking in the big bucks for carrying on this useless pursuit to ‘out’ BO were the types who would be willing to unify under a winning strategy from someone who has pointed out the flaws in their work, urging people to step back and use common sense; then they would have. No one has clicked on the PayPal button on my blog; but I have given away the complaints of election fraud to state A’sG in applicable states; that not only summarize the whole fraud, including specific examples of the absurdity of claims of legitimacy coming from BO’s camp; but also provide a viable means to expose the whole thing, based on existing laws.

I have said this before: what do you suppose would happen if every time one of these lawyers was interviewed, she or he said, ‘Why do you suppose BO/BB tried to trick the federal court into taking judicial notice that Annenberg Political Fact Check said he was for real; instead of handing the court one of NP’s signed Certifications of Nomination swearing he was Constitutionally qualified for the job?’ And held up that footnote from Hollister?

Think about how this would sound. If BO wanted the federal court to rule, he was for real, what is the strongest evidence of that fact? APFC ‘noting’ a phantom image of an unattributed newspaper image OR the word of the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives?
***************************************************************************************************

Then, there was this comment, to me.

#

Carlyle // November 18, 2009 at 8:40 pm

jbjd -

I was wondering about a bigger issue – Shouldn’t there be a “one stop” clearing house somewhere to settle constitutional issues? Trying to guess different avenues to persue – for different types of violations – and then no guarantee that you will be heard – something just isn’t right about that.

And – speaking of guarantees – all of the information you have provided about election rules and AG’s makes sense and is very appealing. BUT – what keeps the AG’s from just ignoring the complaints?
****************************************************************************************************

My response…

#

jbjd // November 18, 2009 at 9:01 pm

Carlyle, the one-stop shop to settle Constitutional issues is the SCOTUS. NO CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES ARE SUSPECT HERE! I know people do not want to hear that but, it’s true! The Electors and the Congress did exactly what the Constitution required. BO is the POTUS. Yes; I agree he is not qualified under the Constitution. But enough people did not require such qualification that, he was lawfully elected. This does not mean, his lack of qualifications cannot be exposed, and result in his Impeachment. (Yes, I also believe, according to the Constitution,, this provides the ONLY lawful mechanism for removing him from office, in this case.)

I am right; and no matter how many people continue to fight ME on this, they are wrong. The courts have clearly backed me up; and all the temper tantrums and name calling will not change a thing.

Bob Bauer wrote a textbook on federal election law. He knew, BO could take office without vetting as to Constitutional qualification. But he did not count on my figuring out how it was done. (NP signing the Certifications; misallocating delegates; caucus fraud; silence pledged delegates from vote binding states, etc.)

I am right. Hate me; call me names; whatever. Keep asking the question: given the documents in the public record, on what basis did NP Certify to state election officials in August 2008 that BO was Constitutionally qualified for the job of POTUS, to get them to print his name next to the D on the general election ballot?
************************************************************************************************

And, finally, this exchange.

#

venice // November 18, 2009 at 9:18 pm

jbjd,

Where do things stand with the AG’s? D2i tells us there hasn’t been a word.
#

jbjd // November 18, 2009 at 9:22 pm

venice,

Hundreds of thousands of ‘pink slips’ make the news. What are a few hundred complaints to state A’sG? Are people camping out outside of the AG’s office to get word s/he is investigating? What about all of those groups out there, supposedly fighting to expose BO? Have they looked up the laws in their states to see whether they can file these complaints? In states where such complaints are not applicable, are people sending these complaints to their state officials / press to expose the fraud?

I have no idea what individual A’sG are doing. Why don’t you ask them?

Some people find helpful listening to a summary of the election fraud perpetrated by the D’s in the 2008 election cycle. Then, they fill in the details by reading the blog. However you educate yourself, remember, as long as the thieves know more about our political system than you, it makes no sense to assume, they will not steal the nomination, again.

Here’s a condensed version of my last 2 (two) ‘appearances’ on Revolution Radio with drkate, wherein I try to teach my audience how the D’s, led by Nancy Pelosi, were able to steal the Presidential nomination.

…Plans had been put in place years ago to steal the D Presidential nomination. Delegates in Texas over allocated to black districts and under allocated to Latino districts? Check. ACORN hired to rig the caucuses? Check. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, agreed to Chair the DNC Convention and sign the bogus Certifications of Nomination swearing to state election officials he is Constitutionally eligible for the job so they would print his name next to the D on the general election ballot? Check. Now, if everything went according to plan, she would drop out after Super Tuesday. Six (6) months later, he would be swept into nomination by a unanimous vote on the floor vote at the Convention. And no one would be the wiser that they had stolen his nomination.

Only, she did not drop out and so, they ratcheted up the fraud.

Now, they disengaged the software identifying country of origin of campaign contributions – foreign exchange rates could account for those odd figures in the black – to fund a magic extravaganza. They hired the press to report the lie, she had no chance to take the nomination, even while winning the popular vote and more pledged delegates as the result of votes cast directly for her than for him. (And she’s racist, too.) They bribed super delegates to commit to him, measuring success in direct proportion to the cost of that support.

They subtracted delegates pledged to vote for her, and added them to him, facing the cameras with the tortured logic people in Michigan would have voted for him if he hadn’t removed his name from the ballot. They threatened her delegates in every state to switch to voting for him before the Convention.

Only, they forgot about those pledged delegates from the 13 (thirteen) vote binding states, including California, who are required by state laws to vote for the candidate voters elected them to represent, in the roll call vote on the floor of the Convention. And they didn’t count on someone like me figuring out what they were doing. But I did; and I reported to A’sG in vote binding states, ‘Members of the D party have infiltrated your state and are encouraging her pledged delegates to break the law by switching to him before the Convention. Stop them!’ And it worked.

Until, finally, the only way left to steal the nomination for him was to prevent her delegates from vote binding states, from voting on the floor of the Convention. So, Chairwoman Pelosi called off the traditional roll call vote from the floor of the Convention…

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2009/10/29/Revolution-Radio-Witness-to-Election-Fraud
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2009/11/05/Revolution-Radio-Witness-to-Election-Fraud-Part-II

I had intended to issue these revised Complaints of Election Fraud against various members of the Democratic Party and Requests for Investigation by State Attorneys General, anyway; but when I read in FOX News that Robert Bauer, Esquire, General Counsel to the DNC and personal attorney to Barack Obama could replace White House Counsel Greg Craig by the end of the year, I decided to post these updated complaints in an homage to him. BAUER TO BE NAMED WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL?

Judging by the historical collaboration between Mr. Bauer and the POTUS, achieving a better match between attorney and client appears unlikely.

This line in the article, which FOX attributes to Wikipedia, jumped out at me: “Bauer is highly regarded in Democratic circles as a tenacious and brilliant lawyer ….” If true, this statement exemplifies everything that is contemptible about Mr. Bauer and his Democratic clientele, including Mr. Obama: they conflate hubris with intellect.

How else to explain Mr. Bauer gets points for helping his clients – The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives and Chair of the 2008 DNC Convention; The Honorable Harry Reid, Majority Leader of the U.S. Senate; and Tim Kaine, Governor of Virginia and Chair of the DNC (his AG is the recipient of several of these complaints) – elect a President merely saying, he is Constitutionally qualified for the job?

Or this, from the Complaints to the A’sG, describing how he asked a federal judge to take judicial notice of a mirage.

In January 2009, Mr. Obama was the named Defendant in a case filed in federal district court, ostensibly seeking to determine whether the Uniform Code of Military Justice required a military Plaintiff to obey orders from a Commander in Chief he was not certain was a NBC. (Pleadings for Hollister v. Soetoro, Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR, can be found on line at http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/08/09/rumors-lies-and-unsubstantiated-facts/.) Mr. Obama submitted a Motion to Dismiss predicated on Plaintiff’s failure to establish the Court’s jurisdiction; and to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (The Defendant was represented by Attorney Robert F. Bauer of PERKINS COIE LLP, who signed the pleadings submitted to the court on his client’s behalf.) Additionally, Mr. Obama asked the court to take judicial notice of the following ‘fact’: he had publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Hawaii. (Presumably, he used the phrase “publicly produced” referring to the fact, he posted that photocopied COLB on his FTS web site.) Yet he did not provide the court with the ‘original’ COLB so the Clerk could mark up the document as evidence and place it in the case record (where it would be subject to scrutiny by the Plaintiff or the judge’s in-camera inspection). Instead, he tried to authenticate that internet COLB just by asking the court to take “notice” that Annenberg Political Fact Check (“APFC”) “conclude[d] that the birth certificate is genuine.” http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/08/09/rumors-lies-and-unsubstantiated-facts/ (APFC is one of many such organizations wholly funded by the Annenberg Foundation, which also paid his salary as Chair of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge from 1995-1999.) (And recall he wrote on FTS, this COLB only establishes he is a “native citizen,” anyway.)

Given the fact that 2008 DNC Convention Chair Pelosi is also the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, making her 3rd in line of Presidential succession, with all of the gravitas incorporated therein, it defies credulity that Mr. Obama would seek judicial notice of the lesser fact he is a native citing APFC says he is; but not offer into evidence the DNC Official Certification of Nomination Ms. Pelosi submitted to election officials in the state of HI, swearing Barack Obama is “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution,” or any one of the dozens of her signed Certifications, which persuaded election officials throughout the country to print the name of Barack Obama next to the D on the Presidential ballots in the 2008 general election.

Eschewing reliance on Ms. Pelosi’s Certification, incredibly, Mr. Obama asked the court to take judicial notice of this information: APFC “note[d] a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper.” In fact, APFC had only posted on their web site an image of an unattributed ‘newspaper announcement,’ which phantom image they admitted they had usurped from the “td” blog, where it was posted anonymously. (Note: the “td” TexasDarlin blog site was closed by its owner in August 2009.) With no further investigation into that ‘announcement,’ APFC declared, “The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.” http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html) Like APFC, Defendant Obama omitted the name of this publication. And he failed to enter into the court record any physical evidence of a newspaper announcement, making his claims there was such an announcement, as with his claims the internet COLB was real, impossible to verify, too.

It’s true. Mr. Bauer actually asked a federal judge to take judicial notice that APFC ‘noted’ an imaginary newspaper birth announcement; and that Barack Obama “publicly produced” a “birth certificate” that can only be observed through a computer screen. And he had the audacity to hope the court would grant his wish. Thank goodness, the only relief The Honorable Judge James Robertson granted was the Motion to Dismiss. Because know what Mr. Bauer would have done if Judge Robertson had been as “impressed” with his tenacity as Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Kaine, et al.? He would have twisted judicial notice that APFC made a ‘note’ on their web site and that Mr. Obama posted something on the internet; into a ruling by the federal court that his client is a NBC.

In my opinion, more than 1 (one) ‘birther’ attorney has earned sanctions from the federal court.

(editing assistance provided by d2i)
***************************************************************************************************
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR DISTRIBUTING COMPLAINTS

1. Download complaint from Scribd by clicking on link below complaint.
2. Fill in your real name and address. Your residency in that state entitles you to the services of your AG.
3. AG complaint gets faxed; copies to parties noted on complaint may be sent by any means preferred.
4. Please distribute copies of filed complaints to the press.

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SOUTH CAROLINIANS

Even if you have previously filed a complaint, please, re-file. Evidently the fax number to the AG’s office was incorrect; and this means, the copies you distributed are copies of documents not on file. So, please, re-file, and re-distribute copies. (The bad news, you need to duplicate your work. The good news? This revised complaint is dynamite.)

GEORGIA

MARYLAND

SOUTH CAROLINA

TEXAS

VIRGINIA

There’s an old saying that goes something like, ‘If it looks like a duck; walks like a duck; and quacks, it’s a duck.’

Well, election fraud in the Palmetto State is quacking its head off.

The cast of characters in the South Carolina election scene reads like a ‘Who’s Who’ of Democratic politics. The Fowlers, Carol and Don, are as much a touchstone of the SC Democratic Party as are the Kennedys in Massachusetts. Don is the former DNC Chair. Carol is the Chair of the SC Democratic Committee. Although married for only 3½ years, they have worked together in party politics for over 30 years. Both are members of the DNC’s powerful Rules and Bylaws Committee; both were Super Delegates to the 2008 DNC Convention. In the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primary election, Don claimed he supported HRC; his wife supported BO.

Kathy Hensley, Treasurer of the SC Democratic Party, has been active in politics for over 40 (forty) years. In 1968, she was the National Finance Manager, McCarthy for President; she was Assistant to the State Director, Richard Gephardt for President 2004. She has been President and board member of a number of local, regional, and national non-profit organizations and participated as a volunteer and staff member in many local, state, and national campaigns in both Virginia and South Carolina. Currently she is Chair of the Lexington County Democratic Party in Virginia.

Garry Staub is currently the Public Information Officer for the South Carolina Election Commission. He has worked for the Commission at least 8 (eight) years, being mentioned in the minutes of the meeting of the SCEC back on April 19, 2001. (Note: At that time, he was their Training Coordinator.)

As previously posted on this blog, on November 1, 2007 Carol Fowler typed a memorandum to the SC Election Commission, certifying the names of the D candidates that should appear on the January 28, 2008 Presidential Primary ballot. The names of these candidates, including Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, and others, were typed below. Then, she informed the SCEC enclosed was a check for $160,000, $20,000 for each of the “seven” candidates and signed her name. (There were 8 (eight) candidates in all.) But as you saw, beneath the typed portion of the memo and, partially superimposed over her signature, appeared several handwritten lines, below which was the signature of Kathy Hensley, and the date, November 1. (Scroll to the 4th document shown.)

I recognized that the language of her handwritten note mimicked the SC statute. So, I wondered, how did Kathy Hensley come to hand write the statutory language that appears on the bottom of Carol Fowler’s typed candidate certification memo? Enlisting Dawn’s help, I can now answer that question.

Turns out, Kathy Hensley hand-delivered Carol Fowler’s November 1, 2007 memo to the offices of the SCEC. Garry Baum said so. He remembered that someone in the office – he could not recall whether he or another staffer – pointed out, ‘she’ “forgot” to add the statutory language that the D candidates listed to get their names printed on the SC primary ballot were eligible for the job. He said she had not noticed this language was missing, on her own.

So, Ms. Hensley added the required language, then and there, along with her signature. And that explains the unusual appearance of the state D party Certification of names for the Presidential Preference primary election.

This omission begs the question: Was Chairwoman Fowler’s oversight intentional? Who knows. On the one hand, she was only elected to that position in April 2007. On the other hand, along with her husband, she had been involved in party politics for over 30 years. Ms. Hensley, another party veteran, ostensibly had not seen this omission. Had she seen the letter at any time before she handed it over to the Election Commission and failed to notice the missing language of eligibility verification? Maybe, maybe not.

And this: Does the organization of the D party or, the laws of the state of SC authorize the Treasurer of the party to authenticate the eligibility of the names of the D candidates submitted to the Election Commission to be placed on the ballot?

These are only some of the questions appropriately asked in the context of a criminal investigation.

Now, I want to explain how people throughout the blogosphere thoroughly misconstrued the (posting of the) August 14, 2008 letter from Carol Fowler to the SCEC, Certifying the names of the candidates that should be placed on the general election ballot as well as their eligibility for the job, which was posted on the web site, “americamustknow,” and linked to from the blog “yourfellowcitizen.” http://americamustknow.com/Documents/southcarolinabologna.pdf

As you can see, this August 14, 2008 document appears to be 1 of 3 documents faxed to the recipient, shown by page numbers in the upper right hand corner, “1,” “2,” and “3.” Ms. Fowler’s August 14 letter is page 2; the document on page 3 is the Official DNC Certification of Nomination signed by NP on August 27. People who read these documents – Ms. Fowler’s August 14 letter and the Official DNC Certification of BO’s nomination – have expressed their indignation that Ms. Fowler certified the nominees 2 (two) weeks before the DNC Convention. How did she know BO and JB would win the nomination! But this outrage was, understandably, based on their mistaken belief that, the DNC Official Certification of Nomination posted as page 3, necessarily contains the information referenced in Ms. Fowler’s August 14 letter, page 2, which immediately precedes it on the published pages. But in fact, notwithstanding they are numbered sequentially, page 2 of the fax had absolutely nothing to do with page 3.

As we know, the Official DNC Certification of Nomination was submitted to the SCEC by DNC General Counsel Sandler; you can access his letter posted on this blog in “UP TO HERE IN ELECTION FRAUD IN SC. FROM THE CHAIR OF THE 2008 DNC CONVENTION TO THE CHAIR OF THE DNC.” (As you have seen, Mr. Sandler’s letter contained no Certification of eligibility for BO or JB but, as we have just discussed above, their eligibility was sworn to by Ms. Hensley, in November 2007, when their names were submitted for inclusion on that state’s January 2008 Presidential Preference primary ballot.) Rather, the candidates to whose eligibility Ms. Fowler attested in that August 14 letter, did not include BO and JB as the Presidential and Vice-Presidential nominees for the party, but all of the ‘down ticket’ Democrats whose names the state D party wanted to appear on SC’s general election ballot, names listed on pages that were attached to her filing with the SCEC but omitted from subsequent postings on the above-sited blogs. Here is that list of D candidates, in its entirety.

In sum, the August 14 letter from SC D state party Chair Carol Fowler Certifying the names and the eligibility of D candidates to appear on that state’s general election ballot appears to be kosher. On the other hand, that November 1, 2007 typed and hand-written memo Certifying the names and eligibility of D candidates to appear on that state’s Presidential Preference primary, signed by both Ms. Fowler and Ms. Hensley, could have ‘election fraud’ written all over it.

Biographical information taken from these sites.
http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/campaign-2008/2008/05/30/its-not-all-in-the-family-for-some-dnc-rules-committee-members.html
http://www.scvotes.org/files/ACCT.%20REPORT%2008-09.pdf
http://www.lexingtonchronicle.com/clients/lexingtonchronicle/20090514PageA6.pdf
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2008/biden/bidenorgsc.html
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:oILs9qPDv7oJ:www.aspaonline.org/swpa/BTGFall_08%255B5%255D.pdf+profiles+of+outstanding+women+kathy+hensley+south+carolina&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
http://www.state.sc.us/scsec/minutes/apr01.htm

Everyone, I am working on the next post, deconstructing South Carolina’s ‘interesting’ Certification letter for the 2008 Presidential Preference primary, which should be up momentarily; and the one after that, which will be the MD election fraud complaint to the AG.

Meanwhile, catch me up with what is happening with your efforts to compel officials in your state government to respond to your expressed concerns about the legitimacy of this past election.

noquarterusa
cbs2Chicago
abclocal
wbbm780
christiannewswire
uslaw

UPDATE 10.09.09, AFTER THE HEARING: I got a call from d2i after her testimony before the VA BoE, and asked her to send a brief summary of her appearance, which I am posting here. (Scroll down to read actual testimony, posted earlier.)

To my jbjd family –
Thank you for your kind words and prayers of support. They worked.

I set out to achieve three goals today regarding my testimony before the Virginia State Board of Elections:

1. To inform the members of the State Board of the election fraud AND to request they send my complaint for immediate investigation to AG Mims.
2. To literally take the heavyweight of carrying around all these months this information and the burden that comes with it. None of this fraud belongs to me or you, but we have studied it, we understand exactly what the DNC, State Democratic Parties and Chair Pelosi did to perpetrate election fraud across the United States, and we know more about the empty suit who occupies the People’s House.
3. To have the testimony entered into record.

Regarding the first goal, we know that the complaint is criminal. We’ve known that all along. This is the chief reason why these complaints are sent to respective AGs offices across the USA rather than Election Boards. However, after reading the SBEs website and code regarding election fraud, I wanted to be safe, cover all of the bases to be certain all i’s were dotted and t’s crossed. I wanted to be certain no one could come back and say, you should have gone through the SBEs. Therefore, the Chair, after allowing me the time to read my complaint stated correctly that this matter is not in the purview of the SBEs but rather the Commonwealth’s Attorney.

However, it is now on the record with the SBE which was my third goal.

And I do feel a bit lighter. I don’t know about you but to finally take all that we know and put it into a big burlap sack and give it back to the charlatans that thrust these lies into our lives is somewhat relieving. Although the burden is a bit lighter, I still carry a load. Aaarrrgggghhhhh!

Lastly, I want to let you know that SBE Chair, Jean Cunningham, was gracious and accommodating. She extended an apology about Monday’s mishap and thanked me in the end for bringing this testimony to the board.

So, no fireworks, folks. Just respect for the process and the opportunity to get my testimony into the record. By the way, the Chair thanked me and dismissed me allowing for no questions from the members. She did her job. I did mine. If the members wish to reach out to me to learn more they know where to find me. So with that, I want to tell you that you need to do the same thing. It’s important to get this into the record especially when it comes to future elections.

Onward!!!

UPDATE 10.09.09: The testimony that d2i will present to the VA Board of Elections has been added below.

Whether you are one of the 18 (eighteen) people who have already filed complaints of election fraud in VA; or just a concerned citizen of that great Commonwealth, I want to alert you to the public meeting of the Board of Elections, who will determine whether to recommend to the AG, that his office conduct an investigation into these charges. d2i has forward the particulars, below.

I will post the testimony we have prepared for the record. However, due to scheduling challenges about which we will elaborate after this public meeting, comments concerning these complaints will only be allowed after consideration of items printed on the Agenda, in the public comments section of the meeting. Speakers will be limited in time and number at the discretion of the Chair of the Board of Elections.

d2i has asked for 5 (five) minutes to re-present her concerns about election fraud.

http://www.sbe.virginia.gov/cms/documents/Public_Notices/Agenda_-_10-09-09.pdf

Virginia State Board of Elections
What: SBE Meeting
When: Friday, October 9, 2009
Time: 11:00 am EST
Where: General Assembly Building, 4th Floor East Conference Room

TESTIMONY OF d2i TO THE VIRGINIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS:

Good morning, Madam Chair, and members of the Board of Elections,

My name is (name omitted) and I am a long time resident of this great Commonwealth of Virginia. I sincerely thank you for this opportunity to provide citizen testimony to the Board. I will keep my remarks brief.

I am here today seeking a response to the complaint I delivered to the Board almost 3 (three) weeks ago, charging that during the 2008 general election, The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, acting in the non-governmental role of Chair, 2008 DNC Convention, committed election fraud by Certifying to this Board that Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee for President of the United States, was Constitutionally eligible for the job so that you would place his name on our general election ballot, even though based on documents in the public record she could not have ascertained whether Mr. Obama was eligible for the job.

Let me explain how I came to file this complaint.

I followed the 2008 primary very closely. At some point, I began hearing rumors concerning whether Barack Obama was a natural born citizen. Evidently, these rumors reached the candidate, too. Because in June 2008, he created a web site called “Fight the Smears” for the express purpose of ‘getting out the truth.’ On the web site, he posted a photocopy of a heavily redacted image of a document entitled, “Certification of Live Birth,” indicating he was born in Hawaii. He now proclaimed this image proved he was a “native” of the U.S.A.

But having taught Constitutional law, surely he knows, the Constitution requires him to be a “natural born citizen.” Besides, how did we know whether this document was even real? Well, it seems the candidate was one step ahead of us.

In case we didn’t take his word, he said we could just ask Annenberg Political Fact Check; he even provided a link from his site to theirs. He assured us, Annenberg was an “independent group.”

No, they’re not. Annenberg is the same group that had hired him to run their Chicago Annenberg Challenge.

Not surprisingly, Annenberg rubber stamped Mr. Obama’s claims: ‘We have seen the original Certification of Live Birth and we find this proves he was “born in the U.S.A.”

Why would I believe them?

Then, in August 2008, without even a roll call vote on the floor of the DNC Convention, Chairwoman Pelosi Certified Barack Obama had been “duly nominated” as the Democratic candidate for President, and submitted this Official DNC Certification of Nomination to this Board. And you added his name to our general election ballot.

Now, as you know, Virginia law requires that only the names of eligible candidates may appear on our ballots. Plus, the law requires the major political parties to determine candidate eligibility. DNC rules also say, the nominee must be Constitutionally eligible for the job. So, it only makes sense that when you received that Certification from Ms. Pelosi, you assumed Mr. Obama was a natural born citizen.

But based on the documentation available in the public record – an image of a document redacted so as to prevent further investigation, posted on a web site paid for by the candidate, and verified as real by his former employer – I had to wonder:

HOW ON EARTH DID NANCY PELOSI VERIFY THIS MAN WAS ELIGIBLE FOR THE JOB? Then, 4 (four) months AFTER she signed this Certification, something happened that made me believe, she didn’t.

In January 2009, Barack Obama was the Defendant in a civil suit brought in federal district court, in which Plaintiffs tried to get to the heart of his Presidential eligibility status. Mr. Obama, through his attorneys, submitted a Motion to Dismiss based on procedural issues like standing and jurisdiction. But they also inserted into the Motion this odd footnote.

Mr. Obama asked the judge not only to dismiss the case but also to take judicial notice of the ‘fact,’ Annenberg Political Fact Check said, they had seen the original Certification of Live Birth, a copy of which is posted on his web site; and it is real.

Think about that. Four months earlier, when Chairwoman Pelosi signed that Certification of Nomination, the best evidence she could have that he was even a citizen, was that photocopied redacted image posted on the internet, which Annenberg said only proved, he was born in the U.S.A.

But in January 2009, the best evidence to establish, Mr. Obama was a natural born citizen, was that Certification of Nomination signed by Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, 3rd in line of Presidential succession, which was submitted to elections officials in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, who, based on this document, printed his name on their general election ballots.

With all of the gravitas of THIS document, why on earth didn’t he ask the federal judge to take judicial notice of THIS?

Well, I have to tell you, since Mr. Obama determined that document was not good enough for the federal court then, I decided, it’s not good enough for my Board of Elections.

In a state like VA, with a law that says, the candidate must be eligible to appear on the ballot; swearing he is eligible without first ascertaining whether he is, is election fraud. And based on these facts I just presented, as well as others I did not present due to time constraints but which facts are in my written complaint, I believe Nancy Pelosi committed election fraud here.

Therefore, I respectfully request that you refer this complaint to the Attorney General so that he can commence a formal investigation.

Thank you.

This will teach me.

Here’s the bad news. I was so anxious to draft the SC Complaint of Election Fraud to the AG, that I assumed Ms. Carol Fowler, Chair of the state D party had submitted the requisite Certifications of Nomination for BO to the SC Election Commission. After all, 2 (two) weeks earlier, she had forwarded the letter confirming the names of D candidates to go on the ballot for lesser offices, Certifying all of these candidates were eligible for the jobs sought. So, even though I hadn’t yet obtained the exact documents for SC I just had to see before I would write a complaint for any other applicable state; in SC, I merely assumed, Ms. Fowler must have submitted BO’s bona fides, too, either Certifying his eligibility independently, as was done in TX; or by forwarding the Certifications signed by NP, Chair of the 2008 DNC Convention.

But I was wrong. Very wrong.

In fact, I just received a document from a reader who calls herself Dawn, which completely blows my assumptions out of the water. Listen to this.

In South Carolina, unlike in most other states (AZ, RI, and NH, for example), the candidates who want to run in the Presidential Preference primaries must have their names submitted to state elections officials by the state parties in order to get their names printed on the SC ballot! And those parties must not only provide these names but also Certify, the candidates are at the time or, will be by the time of the election, eligible for the job. In SC, Barack Obama’s name was on that list of primary candidates who, according to state party Chair Carol Fowler and Treasurer Kathy Hensley, were Constitutionally eligible for the job. But as the evidence indicates, there appears to be no basis in fact on which they could have ascertained he is a NBC. As a result, in addition to alleging fraud against the people responsible for getting the state to print BO’s name on SC’s general election ballot, Mmes Fowler and Hensley are also charged with committing election fraud in the primary election.

And wait till you read who is charged with committing fraud in SC’s general election.

The good news? No one downloaded the old SC complaint! So, here’s the new complaint for election fraud for SC. As always, download the complaint from Scribd by clicking the link below. Fill in your name and address and fax the complaint to AG McMaster, with copies to Marci Andino at the Election Commission; and the 6 (six) named people from the DNC.

And here are the supporting documents referred to in that complaint.

© 2009 jbjd

Just because none of us knows whether Barack Obama is a Natural Born Citizen does not mean, he is not a Natural Born Citizen; but if a state Attorney General supports charges of election fraud against the Democratic Party for swearing he is a Natural Born Citizen without ascertaining whether this is true, this does mean, he should be facing Articles of Impeachment.

Question: In states that require the candidate for POTUS whose name is printed on the general election ballot to be Constitutionally eligible for the job, if a state Attorney General finds that a member of the Democratic Party committed election fraud by signing and submitting to state election officials a Certification of Nomination for Barack Obama as the Democratic Party’s candidate for President of the United States without first ascertaining whether he was Constitutionally eligible for the job; does this mean, he is not Constitutionally eligible for the job?

Answer: No. It means the U.S. House of Representatives must send Articles of Impeachment to the Senate for prosecution.

Let me explain.

As spelled out with particularity in the complaints of election fraud filed with state A’sG in applicable states, between June 2008, when Mr. Obama admitted in Fight the Smears (“FTS”) that questions existed as to his citizenship status; and August 2008, when NP or the state D party Chairs signed the Certification delivered to state elections officials to put his name on the general election ballot, the only basis in the public record for authenticating he was even born in the U.S.A. was provided by Annenberg Political Fact Check (“APFC”). Therefore, a finding of election fraud means, if NP et al. relied on these representations provided by APFC to base their sworn Certifications BO is Constitutionally eligible to be POTUS, such evidence is insufficient to prove he is a NBC.

Let me say that another way. Since only APFC appears in the public record to support BO’s Constitutional eligibility for POTUS at the time party officials Certified such qualification to the states; and since state A’sG found no basis for such Certification then, APFC authentication fails to establish BO is a NBC.

It is this implicit finding that APFC fails to establish BO is a NBC, which triggers Articles of Impeachment.

Question: Why does eliminating APFC as a credible source to authenticate BO’s Constitutional eligibility to be POTUS trigger Articles of Impeachment?

Answer: Because when petitioned by Constituents to forestall ratification of the Electoral College vote for Barack Obama for President based on questions as to his Constitutional eligibility for the job, members of the U.S. House of Representatives (as well as the U.S. Senate) admitted they believed such concerns for authenticity were unfounded based solely on the reassurances they had obtained from APFC. http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/if-drowning-out-opposing-facts-is-un-american-then-ignoring-unpleasant-facts-must-be-un-american-too/

Thus, at least for these several members of Congress who corresponded to their Constituents, eliminating this dubious source for such authentication means, no basis exists in fact to determine they ratified a vote for a POTUS who is a NBC. But since they did ratify the EC vote and, BO swore the Constitutionally required Oath of Office then, the Constitution provides he can now be removed from office by means of the Articles of Impeachment.
http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?63+Law+&+Contemp.+Probs.+201+%28WinterSpring+2000%29